Author: Simon Walter Date: To: dng Subject: Re: [DNG] Why Debian 8 Pinning is (or isn't) pointless
On 07/29/2016 01:28 PM, Steve Litt wrote: > On Fri, 29 Jul 2016 10:49:32 +0900
> Simon Walter <simon@???> wrote:
>
>> On 07/29/2016 10:00 AM, info at smallinnovations.nl wrote:
>>> On 29-07-16 01:43, Rick Moen wrote:
>>>> If you can suggest an additional method, I'll be glad to amend my
>>>> list of suggestions. Otherwise, I'm not sure what your point is.
>>> Your point is quite clear: you do not want a fork of debian and
>>> that is the whole point of you being vocal on this list is it not?
>>> I suppose you are quite good in Debian politics.
>>>
>>> Adding you to my blacklist now.
>>
>> Rick, that's exactly what I was talking about. You might be well
>> intentioned, but in so many words you are saying that you disagree
>> with a fork of Debian. So of course people here will not see you as
>> well intentioned and a quite possibly many other negative things.
>
> In all fairness to Rick, he was making his statements on SVLUG, and
> then, on DNG, *I* referenced the SVLUG archive of the SVLUG discussion,
> and only then did he repeat his assertions here.
>
::
Re: [DNG] Why Debian 8 Pinning is (…
