:: Re: [DNG] [Grml] Is grml still al…
Top Page
Delete this message
Reply to this message
Author: Arnt Karlsen
Date:  
To: dng
Subject: Re: [DNG] [Grml] Is grml still alive
On Wed, 20 Jul 2016 15:18:53 +0200, Arnt wrote in message
<20160720151853.6a52ce20@???>:

> On Wed, 20 Jul 2016 14:09:14 +0200, Alexander wrote in message
> <20160720120914.GC25029@???>:
>
> > On Wed, 20 Jul 2016, Arnt Karlsen wrote:
> >
> > >
> > > ..looks like Grml is a loss: http://bts.grml.org/grml/issue1568
> > > Pity. https://duckduckgo.com/?q=alternatives+to+udev&ia=web
> > >
> > > ..systemd, udev etc pötterication has no more tech etc merit than
> > > e.g. Erdogan's ban on Turk academics going on e.g. vacation
> > > abroad.
> > >
> >
> > Please don't Cc our mailinglist again.
>
> ..from which mailing list am I now being banished? ;o)
> I am aware I am not welcome on Debian mailing lists due to my
> knowledge of banana republic politics and how they brought systemd
> upon Debian, and therefore didn't cc any Debian mailing lists. ;o)
>


..it appears Alexander Wirt <formorer@???> (alias
Alexander Wirt <debian-backports@???>?) meant
the grml mailing list. Oh well. :o)

--
..med vennlig hilsen = with Kind Regards from Arnt Karlsen
...with a number of polar bear hunters in his ancestry...
Scenarios always come in sets of three:
best case, worst case, and just in case.