:: Re: [DNG] package request
Top Page
Delete this message
Reply to this message
Author: dev1fanboy
Date:  
CC: dng
Subject: Re: [DNG] package request
Also I heard they do include some non restricted graphic in their sources as the default when building, the graphic they use in the binary builds is the one they use those terms for I believe.

Cheers,

chillfan

On Tuesday, June 14, 2016 4:32 AM, dev1fanboy <devuanfanboy@???> wrote:
> Yeah it's a pretty great browser, rename/rebrand and it won't matter. Best
> to stay away from the whole "the brand is ours" thing. All one needs
> really is a graphic that looks like a moon or other various space "rock"
> and it'll be fine.
>
> Cheers,
>
> chillfan
>
> On Tuesday, June 14, 2016 2:57 AM, Steve Litt <slitt@???>
> wrote:
>> On Tue, 14 Jun 2016 00:34:23 +0100
>> "dev1fanboy" <devuanfanboy@???> wrote:
>>
>>> It would be nice to have palemoon, they are pretty open to choice and
>>> are specifically against adding any DRM support in their browser.
>>> Also, it works with XUL and doesn't have the bloat that Iceweasel
>>> does that is annoying people in later releases. I have heard Debian
>>> will follow the ESR releases (even in stable) so avoiding any of that
>>> whilst having a non chrom(e|ium) browser will be harder if that's
>>> true.
>>>
>>> Only issue with pale moon is the branding:
>>> https://www.palemoon.org/branding.shtml
>>>
>>> Not sure if that's compatible with the main repo, maybe it needs
>>> rebranding first?
>>>
>>> Cheers,
>>>
>>> chillfan
>>
>> Yeah, just call it Bright Star, and swap the pale moon graphic with a
>> beaming star. Then write the author, let him know what you did, and let
>> him know that if he'd like the publicity benefit of having a major
>> distro package Palemoon as Palemoon, he can write Devuan an official
>> letter giving us permanent non-exclusive right to use the name and
>> graphic, and we'll be glad to accommodate him with the publicity.
>>
>> By the way, thanks to emninger's post, I've been using Palemoon as my
>> main browser for almost a week, and it's head and shoulders better than
>> ALL the rest. It's less bloaty than the other XUL browsers, and it's
>> more stable than the webkit based browsers.
>>
>> SteveT
>>
>> Steve Litt
>> June 2016 featured book: Troubleshooting: Why Bother?
>> http://www.troubleshooters.com/twb
>> _______________________________________________
>> Dng mailing list
>> Dng@???
>> https://mailinglists.dyne.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dng
> --
> Take back your privacy. Switch to www.StartMail.com
> _______________________________________________
> Dng mailing list
> Dng@???
> https://mailinglists.dyne.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dng

--
Take back your privacy. Switch to www.StartMail.com