:: Re: [DNG] ifconfig vs ip
Top Page
Delete this message
Reply to this message
Author: Greg Olsen
Date:  
To: dng
Subject: Re: [DNG] ifconfig vs ip
On 2016-06-10 06:34, Greg Olsen wrote:
    [snip]

> The only side-effect are the extra messages during ifup with
> "bridge_ports none":
>
 > iface testbr1 inet static
 >         bridge_ports none
 >         address 10.91.0.1
 >         netmask 255.255.0.0
 >         network 10.91.0.0
 >         broadcast 10.91.255.255
 >         bridge_stp off           # disable Spanning Tree Protocol
 >         bridge_waitport 0        # no delay before a port becomes 

available
 >         bridge_fd 0              # no forwarding delay
 >         up        ip link set $IFACE up
 >         down      ip link set $IFACE down


Sorry to respond to my own post here:
I meant to remove the up/down statements in the example above. Those
aren't needed either when using "bridge_ports none".