:: Re: [DNG] resolved
Top Page
Delete this message
Reply to this message
Author: Rainer Weikusat
Date:  
To: dng
Subject: Re: [DNG] resolved
Klaus Hartnegg <hartnegg@???> writes:
> All programmers please read this, and treat it as a list of things not to do.
>
> https://lists.dns-oarc.net/pipermail/dns-operations/2016-June/014964.html



Hmm ... while this is certainly the usual reimplementation no one to
whom d-bus integration of everything isn't critical needs for
anything and the idea to turn this into another continously running
process is not very sensible, how does this feature-/ behaviour-wise
compare to the existing stub resolver in the C library? In particular,
stub resolvers always rely on something else in order to do the actual
heavy lifting.