:: Re: [DNG] ifconfig vs ip
Top Page
Delete this message
Reply to this message
Author: Simon Walter
Date:  
To: dng
Subject: Re: [DNG] ifconfig vs ip
On 06/03/2016 11:23 PM, Rainer Weikusat wrote:
> This stop-modify-restart is a bit coarse-grained and it's also
> possible to do this manually without 'interface downtime' but there's
> no general interface for that: The sequence of commands will depend on
> both the running configuration and the desired configuration and has
> to be worked out beforehand and then executed. Considering that the
> modified interfaces file can be created before causing any side
> effects and then be swapped atomically via mv in between the down and
> the up, 'play nice with the system' is IMHO a better idea. Changing
> the stored configuration while the interface is up bound to cause
> trouble unless care is taken to ensure that this can be interrupted at
> any point (imagine a sudden power outage) with the system still
> remaining in or capable of returning to an operational state.


Yes, I 100% agree. Thank you for the detailed info.

I am trying to do it like that (using the interfaces file). However,
cdist has some limitations in it's default usage pattern regarding
"down-mod-up". Of course since it's connecting over the network, I need
to be careful what NICs go down and how they are reconfigured.

I think I've hit on something. Since I am adding containers (LXC) and
virtual network to the box, I think I will add an tap and bridge
interface to an /etc/network/interface.d/ file. If I use something like:

auto br0
iface br0 inet static
     pre-up ip tuntap add dev tap0 mode tap
     pre-up ip link set tap0 up
     post-down ip link set tap0 down
     post-down ip tuntap del dev tap0 mode tap
     bridge_ports tap0
     address 10.1.1.1
     netmask 255.255.255.0
     broadcast 10.1.1.255


And make sure there is the source /etc/network/interface.d/* line in the
interfaces file. Then route with iptables between the a physical NIC
(eth0 for example) and the virtual NIC (tap0) and have all the
containers connected to br0.

Are there any glaring problems with this setup?

Thanks everyone again for all the advice and explanations.

Simon