[cut]
> >non-invasive init of*their* choice.
> Yes. The user should have an easy choice of inits. What I meant was
> that SOME init must be default, and if that default init is ever not
> sysvinit, it should be something very different from sysvinit.
>
> SteveT
If that default init is ever not sysvinit, it should be something much
better than sysvinit. Why would you change if it is not better (that is
my main problem with systemd it is not better but worse).


Grtz.

Nick