KatolaZ <katolaz@???> writes: > On Thu, Jun 02, 2016 at 05:57:27PM -0400, Steve Litt wrote:
>
> [cut]
>
>> >
>> > however this is all abstract speculation now. I'm not even sure we'll
>> > make such a big change in testing. most people and organizations
>> > switching to Devuan today (me included) are in need of a system that
>> > does not change their workflow arbitrarily.
>>
>> Yes. I would recommend against *any* init change in the foreseeable
>> future. All I'm saying is that *if and when* we change, the change
>> should be to something very different from sysvinit. Something like
>> Epoch, Runit, or s6.
>>
>
> IMHO, if and when we would like to make a change regarding init
> systems, that change should not be to replace sysvinit with an init
> system of *our* choice, but probably towards allowing users to use the
> non-invasive init of *their* choice.
::
Re: [DNG] SoylentNews discussion
