On Thu, Jun 02, 2016 at 05:57:27PM -0400, Steve Litt wrote:

[cut]

> >
> > however this is all abstract speculation now. I'm not even sure we'll
> > make such a big change in testing. most people and organizations
> > switching to Devuan today (me included) are in need of a system that
> > does not change their workflow arbitrarily.
>
> Yes. I would recommend against *any* init change in the foreseeable
> future. All I'm saying is that *if and when* we change, the change
> should be to something very different from sysvinit. Something like
> Epoch, Runit, or s6.
>

IMHO, if and when we would like to make a change regarding init
systems, that change should not be to replace sysvinit with an init
system of *our* choice, but probably towards allowing users to use the
non-invasive init of *their* choice.

My2Cents

KatolaZ

--
[ Enzo Nicosia aka KatolaZ --- GLUG Catania -- Freaknet Medialab ]
[ me [at] katolaz.homeunix.net -- http://katolaz.homeunix.net -- ]
[ GNU/Linux User:#325780/ICQ UIN: #258332181/GPG key ID 0B5F062F ]
[ Fingerprint: 8E59 D6AA 445E FDB4 A153 3D5A 5F20 B3AE 0B5F 062F ]