On Sun, 29 May 2016, Arnt Karlsen wrote:

> > we'd love to have a vdev package, but maintainance of it in Devuan is
> > not yet assigned. please note that vdev is made to run also in
> > parallel with udev and it should not disturb its functioning, so
> > testing should be fairly easy.
>
> ..eerie. Means systemd-udev can subvert vdev.

why does it means that? I can't see any reason why systemd-udev can
subvert vdev. I'd be surprised to say the least.
I wrote that vdev is engineered to not clash with udev.

> ..is there a non-systemd udev out there anywhere?

yes... this has been extensively covered in docs and messages.

ciao