:: Re: [DNG] Request for Removal of sl…
Top Page
Delete this message
Reply to this message
Author: dev1fanboy
Date:  
CC: dng
Subject: Re: [DNG] Request for Removal of slim package from Devuan
There's a good reason to keep things around too, in that you cannot be forced into a lock-in style upgrade.

Cheers,

chillfan

On Sunday, May 29, 2016 10:35 PM, Arnt Karlsen <arnt@???> wrote:
> On Sun, 29 May 2016 20:37:08 +0100, dev1fanboy wrote in message
> <f6ee7bcc058c54514fec6934121fdca4.startmail@www.startmail.com>:
>
>> To add my two cents..
>>
>> Since it's an important package,
>
> ..I disagree that SLiM is important, we have several alternatives,
> e.g.wdm and xdm.
>
>> maybe it's worth seeing if someone
>> can whip up a patch if there isn't already.
>>
>> Also worth pointing out that lilo is without an upstream maintainer
>> as of recently.
>
> ..which means it too may develop into a problem.
>
> --
> ..med vennlig hilsen = with Kind Regards from Arnt Karlsen
> ...with a number of polar bear hunters in his ancestry...
> Scenarios always come in sets of three:
> best case, worst case, and just in case.
> _______________________________________________
> Dng mailing list
> Dng@???
> https://mailinglists.dyne.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dng

--
Take back your privacy. Switch to www.StartMail.com