:: Re: [DNG] encryption
Top Page
Delete this message
Reply to this message
Author: R. W. Rodolico
Date:  
To: dng
Subject: Re: [DNG] encryption
After TrueCrypt died (and yes, there have been many rumors about why), I
went to LUKS and found a very nice QT front end for cryptsetup named
ZuluCrypt. It allows you to create a volume (file), encrypt it, mount
it, etc... Pretty nice on my workstation.

Source is at https://github.com/mhogomchungu/zuluCrypt, and the package
web site is at https://mhogomchungu.github.io/zuluCrypt/. The author has
packages for installing on Debian (Wheezy and Jessie) on the package
main page. The author was very, very responsive when I found a bug a few
years ago.

I was a TrueCrypt fan for a long time, especially since it worked on
Linux, Windows and OSX. However, due to the rumors and uncertainty of
why the project was abandoned, and my own innate paranoia, I chose to go
with "something else" even though, to my knowledge, I can not use LUKS
on any other OS.

Rod

On 05/29/2016 06:34 PM, Robert Storey wrote:
> Maybe we had this discussion before and I missed it. I did a Google
> search and didn't find it. Anyway, here is my question...
>
> I want to create one encrypted folder on my hard drive. I don't
> necessarily need heavy-duty industrial-strength encryption, but "secure"
> is nice. Reliability is very important - I don't want it to break so I
> wind up losing data.
>
> In the past I've used TrueCrypt, and I didn't have to search long to
> find this page:
>
> https://wiki.debian.org/TrueCrypt/Install/Wheezy
>
> For those too lazy to click the link, it says that TrueCrypt is still
> available but no longer under active development. There is a link to
> some downloadable tar archives on SourceForge. From the looks of it,
> there are NO dependencies, and since there is no further development
> there should be no danger that TrueCrypt will get Potterized.
>
> It also says on that page that there newer alternatives to TrueCrypt,
> ie cryptsetup/LUKS and EncFS. Both of those packages have some
> dependencies, which is why I hesitate. I can easily envision a future
> scenario where udev (and thus systemd) suddenly become mandatory, or
> else forget being able to access your data.
>
> So I'm wondering, am I right to just go with TrueCrypt, or am I being
> ridiculously paranoid? And what are we planning to do with Devuan.
>
> Again, apologies if it was already discussed.
>
> cheers,
> Robert
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Dng mailing list
> Dng@???
> https://mailinglists.dyne.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dng
>


--
Rod Rodolico
Daily Data, Inc.
POB 140465
Dallas TX 75214-0465
214.827.2170
http://www.dailydata.net