:: Re: [DNG] Brief OpenRC/Jessie Discu…
Top Page
Delete this message
Reply to this message
Author: Edward Bartolo
Date:  
To: Jaromil
CC: dng
Subject: Re: [DNG] Brief OpenRC/Jessie Discussion on the linux-elitists lists
Hi,

Jaromil wrote:
<< some of us are from places in which that word means prevarication,
violence, misery and corruption. I've never been entertained by such a
name, not even when it was about slackware packages. very bad taste.
>>


+Infinity

Edward

On 16/05/2016, Jaromil <jaromil@???> wrote:
> On Mon, 16 May 2016, emninger@??? wrote:
>
>> As for the rest, i'd be interested in what you think about the
>> content of that discussion.
>
> I think it minimizes the problem systemd brings to Debian and the
> problem the current Debian leadership has with its own constituency.
> I sincerely wish the remedy of installing openrc and pinning systemd
> would work, but I'm sure it won't on the mid-long term.
>
> To all those who think this and other similar approaches may
> invalidate the need of our fork: please consider we are not just
> forking Debian because of systemd, but because the people who have
> taken over the leadership of that distro have betrayed its mandate,
> shown no respect of its Constitution and offer no reliability anymore
> for any reasonable professional use of Debian.
>
> I'm talking about the hooligans and politicians who are using systemd
> as an occasion to take over and bully away disagreement, those who
> Bruce Perens defines the "anal-retentive policy wonks who believe they
> only make the distribution for themselves and have (perhaps without
> intending to) systematically marginalized Debian and made the project
> a whore to Ubuntu."
> https://linux.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=5852295&cid=48188823
>
> ciao
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Dng mailing list
> Dng@???
> https://mailinglists.dyne.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dng
>