> I need to think a bit more how we can direct information after leaking
> protecting inocent people as much as possible. Is an open debate...

I am not sure at all about this reflexion so for that I require your
opinion. Is just an ethical dilemma thread but looks important to be solved.

For example:

For me, having Turkey's database should not be a goal, should be a tool
for something more.

We can cross this database we another related with for example, Goldman
Sachs members on Turkey who manage to create housing problems on that
way from 2009.

With ID's, names, addresses, etc.. we can totally expose that corrupted
guys without exposing all citizens (activists included). APT-Phising tasks.

I understand that some kind of filter is need. Is easy to imagine that
this can happens to you (your political territory), your family, etc.

Remember some time ago in Amsterdam, how council creates the first
database about citizens and for what was used after it.

So, full disclosure of personal data of citizens can be something to
assume if your government is "protecting" that data correctly.

What's happen when not?. And what's happen when your government is
clearly corrupt?.

So at some way, Who is "ethically" responsible?.

If we reach that answers, we will have more arguments on a debate that
looks is stopping more public actions made by hacktivists on that way.

>> ciao
>
> Besos!
>