:: Re: [DNG] Packaging Vdev
Top Page
Delete this message
Reply to this message
Author: Daniel Reurich
Date:  
To: dng@lists.dyne.org
Subject: Re: [DNG] Packaging Vdev
On 15/03/16 11:33, aitor_czr wrote:
>
> On 03/14/2016 09:04 PM, Daniel Reurich <daniel@???> wrote:
>> On 15/03/16 02:41, aitor_czr wrote:
>>> >
>>> > On 05/03/16 13:31, aitor_czr wrote:
>>>> >>
>>>> >> Something like this?
>>>> >>
>>>> >> 0.1.20160314+1deb1
>>> >
>>> > Sorry:
>>> >
>>> > 0.1.jude20160314+1deb1
>> 0.1.jude20160314-1 is the correct way (according to debian policy).
>
> I wanted to say +deb1uX
>
> Currently, debian stable is using +deb8uX
>
> Isn't it?


That's only for packages that have been upgraded in the stable release
update.

Actually I'd suggest 0.1.20160314-1 is actually best




--
Daniel Reurich
Centurion Computer Technology (2005) Ltd.
021 797 722