:: Re: [DNG] Testing vdev with Busybox
Top Page
This message is part of the following thread:
Mthe complete thread tree sorted by date
Maitor_czr at <-
Maitor_czr at ->
Delete this message
Reply to this message
Author: Daniel Reurich
Date:  
To: dng@lists.dyne.org
New-Topics: [DNG] Packaging Vdev (was Testing vdev with Busybox)
Subject: Re: [DNG] Testing vdev with Busybox
On 14/03/16 11:30, aitor_czr wrote:
> 
> On 03/13/2016 10:41 PM, Didier Kryn <kryn@???> wrote:
>>      I agree. And I think most people on this list would vote like me 
>> for a sequential version number rather than a date. However maybe Jude 
>> had the intent to start the numbering when he delivers a first official 
>> release. This might be the reason for prefixing with 0. May I suggest 
>> using the hash as a minor number and 0 as major?

>>
I'd suggest using a version like:
0.1.jude<date version>+<devuan release starting with 1>

That way when Jude does switch to versioned releases we can assume his
version scheme easily assuming that he starts with > 0.1.


--
Daniel Reurich
Centurion Computer Technology (2005) Ltd.
021 797 722

This message was posted to the following mailing lists:
dng
Mailing List Info | Nearby Messages		<-[DNG] devuan git rearrangement for official packagesRe: [DNG] Testing vdev with Busybox->

Donate to Dyne.org

dyne.org open discussions
administrated by dyne.org hackers		Lurker (version 2.3)