:: Re: [DNG] Icerbergs aren't small ju…
Top Page
This message is part of the following thread:
M-\the complete thread tree sorted by date
M\MRainer Weikusat at <-
MM 
Delete this message
Reply to this message
Author: Rainer Weikusat
Date:  
To: Peter Olson
CC: dng
Subject: Re: [DNG] Icerbergs aren't small just because they're mostly underwater
Peter Olson <peabo@???> writes:

[...]

>> it (the string would need to be copied, including handling errors in
>
> Living on the edge?

The standardized definition of the function requests that unless one is
happy with the original string being changed.
This message was posted to the following mailing lists:
dng
Mailing List Info | Nearby Messages		<-Re: [DNG] Purchasing a new computer/laptop.[DNG] PC compatibility to non-Microsoft software->

Donate to Dyne.org

dyne.org open discussions
administrated by dyne.org hackers		Lurker (version 2.3)