:: Re: [DNG] Icerbergs aren't small ju…
Top Page
This message is part of the following thread:
M--\the complete thread tree sorted by date
M+\MHendrik Boom at <-
MMMkarl at ->
Delete this message
Reply to this message
Author: Didier Kryn
Date:  
To: dng
Subject: Re: [DNG] Icerbergs aren't small just because they're mostly underwater
Le 25/01/2016 13:47, Didier Kryn a écrit :
>
>     while (*r)
>       {
>         if (*r == '/')
>     {
>            r++;
>            n = r;
>         }
>       }
 

     It's not even that. A for loop would do it:


     for (  ;  *r;  r++ )  n = r+1;




This message was posted to the following mailing lists:
dng
Mailing List Info | Nearby Messages		<-Re: [DNG] "Common knowledge?"-questionRe: [DNG] Non-popularity of Lisp->

Donate to Dyne.org

dyne.org open discussions
administrated by dyne.org hackers		Lurker (version 2.3)