:: Re: [DNG] Ummmm, no
Top Page
Delete this message
Reply to this message
Author: Nate Bargmann
Date:  
To: dng
Subject: Re: [DNG] Ummmm, no
* On 2015 31 Dec 14:53 -0600, Miles Fidelman wrote:

> Can you say "kdbus?"


That doesn't worry me much at this stage as unlike at the higher layers
where SD support seems to result in support for certain other APIs being
removed, the kernel has gained all sorts of features over the years that
are either compile time options or modules. Given Linus' track record,
I don't see kdus forcing other RPC code to be removed. Do you?

The kernel operates in too many other use cases where SD is never going
to be a consideration for them (RH, LP, and Co) to break it *that*
badly.

- Nate

--

"The optimist proclaims that we live in the best of all
possible worlds. The pessimist fears this is true."

Ham radio, Linux, bikes, and more: http://www.n0nb.us