:: Re: [DNG] I've got the automounter …
Top Page
This message is part of the following thread:
M-++\the complete thread tree sorted by date
M\MMMmarc at <-
MM 
Delete this message
Reply to this message
Author: Didier Kryn
Date:  
To: dng
Subject: Re: [DNG] I've got the automounter running
Le 29/12/2015 19:20, marc a écrit :
> Nope - not completely isolated. Applications that actually require
> on-disk consistency invoke things such as fsync(2).
>
> Every year or so there is a random blog post which notices that
> if you truly care about your data, you'd better do fsync(2), fdatasync(2)
> and/or rename(2) in the right places.
     Sure.



This message was posted to the following mailing lists:
dng
Mailing List Info | Nearby Messages		<-[DNG] What's "Armstrong"? (was: Fw: Question: eth0 vs enp1s0)Re: [DNG] Proposals for an xfce-desktop-lite->

Donate to Dyne.org

dyne.org open discussions
administrated by dyne.org hackers		Lurker (version 2.3)