Hey Pablo,

Given how tech for SNA (social network analysis) has progressed over a
short number of years, it seems to me it would be relatively easy to
crowdsource such a project (including solicit data from the crowd so
that people would be able to submit information through a website
about actors who influence global politics and have that populate a
graph which would evolve in real time for general SNA purposes).
Thus anyone could submit information to the graph, but there would be
editors for the project so that if the data submitted is ludicrous it
would be able to be modified.

Just my two bits

Pablo:
> I enjoyed http://www.theyrule.net/ in the past, but it's quite old
> already and it's a corporate (not political) power graph only for
> the largest american companies. I would love if something like this
> was done for global political and corporate power.
>
> 2015-09-22 8:57 GMT+02:00 odinn <odinn.cyberguerrilla@???>:
>
> See https://twitter.com/orgnet - orgnet.com - and the software,
> InFlow. (I picked up a copy of it some years back and got
> training from its author, Valdis Krebs... needless to say,
> interesting stuff)
>
> -O
>
> futureleadersofdesign@???:
>>>> http://www.thebrain.com/
>>>>
>>>>> On Sep 21, 2015, at 9:36 AM, Jonathan Valiente
>>>>> <tinkeringengr@???> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> Is there enough data in the public domain to create an
>>>>> association graph of all the actors who influence global
>>>>> politics? Or are we forever rate limited by whistle-blowers
>>>>> from the inside?
>>>>>
>>>>> 'global western interests' Seems like such a fuzzy entity.
>>>>> As if we are just waiting at its mercy for its next play.
>>>>>
>>>>> I desire a graph (nodes and edges) so I can see
>>>>> associations before they happen. For instance, if I looked
>>>>> at the dick cheney node I could see his corporate and
>>>>> political associations along with some well devised metrics
>>>>> of how he politicizes. That way I could see beforehand his
>>>>> associations with halliburton and make meaningful
>>>>> predictions such as the conflict of interest with invading
>>>>> Iraq. I could also see all other actors who are associated
>>>>> with the halliburton keyword.
>>>>>
>>>>> You could start small with a core subset and then
>>>>> continually curate the graph like a wiki. It would be nice
>>>>> to have some sophisticated intelligence, something
>>>>> concrete.
>>>>>
>>>>> I'm sure the CIA is already doing something like this.
>>>>>
>>>>>> On Mon, Sep 21, 2015 at 7:52 AM, Amir Taaki
>>>>>> <genjix@???> wrote: Continuing from our last
>>>>>> emails about Corbyn and global western interests, and the
>>>>>> mythology of liberalist ideas.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Here is an interview with Assange where he talks about
>>>>>> the cables about US plans to destabilise Syria in 2006
>>>>>> through sectarianism and allowing terrorism, and about
>>>>>> Corbyn's anti-NATO anti-military stance.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=W3HWiydFlJc
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Mainly to paraphrase that Corbyn challenging the
>>>>>> military establishment will make some big enemies to
>>>>>> oppose him, and if does show signs of success then it
>>>>>> could even put him in personal danger.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> If this all sounds rather crazy or conspiratorial to you,
>>>>>> then welcome to the new world of the internet where truth
>>>>>> is being rendered visible.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> New article, titled:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> British Army 'could stage mutiny under Corbyn', says
>>>>>> senior serving general
>>>>>>
>>>>>> http://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/politics/british-army-could-
sta
>
>>>>>>
ge-mutiny-under-corbyn-says-senior-serving-general-10509742.html
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
> Orwell wrote a book on the use of English language in politics, and
> here
>>>>>> we see how they have renamed coup d'etat to the less
>>>>>> sinister "mutiny" which gives the impression of a
>>>>>> legitimate rebellion from below, not a power grab by the
>>>>>> army.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Reminds me of another news article on areas under IS
>>>>>> control saying how business are being "extorted" to fund
>>>>>> IS activity i.e they are being taxed.
>>>>>> _______________________________________________ unSYSTEM
>>>>>> mailing list: http://unsystem.net
>>>>>> https://mailinglists.dyne.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/unsystem
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>>
>
>>>>>>
_______________________________________________
>>>>> unSYSTEM mailing list: http://unsystem.net
>>>>> https://mailinglists.dyne.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/unsystem
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>>
_______________________________________________ unSYSTEM mailing
>>>> list: http://unsystem.net
>>>> https://mailinglists.dyne.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/unsystem
>>>>
>
>>>>
>> _______________________________________________ unSYSTEM mailing
>> list: http://unsystem.net
>> https://mailinglists.dyne.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/unsystem
>>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________ unSYSTEM mailing
> list: http://unsystem.net
> https://mailinglists.dyne.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/unsystem
>

- --
http://abis.io ~
"a protocol concept to enable decentralization
and expansion of a giving economy, and a new social good"
https://keybase.io/odinn