no clue if it may be of interest but a while ago I came across Bitmessage . from p2p encryption point of view it should be ok only the address format is inconvenient

On 02.09.2015, at 13:49, Sam <unsystem@???> wrote:

> I wasn't saying something is wrong with GPG per say. But since you mention
> it: The problem with GPG over email is really just the complication. It is not
> easy enough for a child or granny so not everyone uses it. The protocol is
> great, but needs to be merged into the messaging layer itself to solve the
> problem I mention.
>
> What I was more taking about is email. Let us agree/work upon building a
> unified p2p messaging standard to replace it. When standardized and started to
> be implemented across p2p systems, it will win out because it is inherently
> better in that it is private when no non p2p can be. It is uncensorable, Etc.
> It can be spam resistant with POW, Etc.
>
> When the world relies on such a thing for everyday tasks, it will be more
> difficult to take away encryption.
>
> On Wednesday, September 02, 2015 01:41:11 PM Otto Meier wrote:
>> What is faulty with GPG ?
>>
>> On 02.09.2015, at 13:33, Sam <unsystem@???> wrote:
>>> Agreed. We must make many common day things, like basic email, use
>>> encryption software. And I'm not talking about GPG. I'm talking
>>> inherently encrypted p2p messaging.
>>>
>>> Sam
>>>
>>> On Wednesday, September 02, 2015 01:28:01 PM psy wrote:
>>>> Turkey official tells Al Jazeera charges made after fixer found to have
>>>> encryption software used by ISIL on his laptop....
>>>>
>>>> http://www.aljazeera.com/news/2015/09/vice-news-fixer-arrested-encryption
>>>> -so ftware-150901200622345.html
>>>>
>>>> ....
>>>>
>>>> It is increasingly clear that the world's governments see the encryption
>>>> tool as a threat to the repression. I begin to see many similar news..
>>>>
>>>> In the following years they will try to ban it "legally" with the
>>>> complicity of the manufacturers and big IT companies (that will
>>>> implement ONLY in-secure encryption breakeable by secret agencies).
>>>>
>>>> We have to remember that 'encrypt' will be a crime shortly.
>>>>
>>>> Maybe agood way to avoid this is to make more widespread encryption. If
>>>> not, will be so easy to them recognize who is using encryption just
>>>> sniffing traffic massively.
>>>>
>>>> What's your opinion?. Let's brainstorm some strategies...
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> unSYSTEM mailing list: http://unsystem.net
>>> https://mailinglists.dyne.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/unsystem
>
> _______________________________________________
> unSYSTEM mailing list: http://unsystem.net
> https://mailinglists.dyne.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/unsystem