:: Re: [DNG] *****SPAM***** Re: C stri…
Top Page
Delete this message
Reply to this message
Author: Steve Litt
Date:  
To: dng
Subject: Re: [DNG] *****SPAM***** Re: C string handling
On Sat, 22 Aug 2015 21:46:05 +0200
"tilt!" <tilt@???> wrote:

> I agree with Laurent, the RCVD_IN_DYNABLOCK rule weight should
> be lowered below treshhold, because
>
> 1. it's incorrect to mark a mail as spam solely based on this
>     criterion, because a significant portion of internet users are
>     in dynablocks, and not all of them are spammers;

>
> 2. the list already has moderation in place for off-list mails,
>     so why be so rigid.


3. Because if we start blowing off people with confirmed records of
writing code, such as Laurent has done with s6, then what would
distinquish our list from Debian-User?

SteveT

Steve Litt
August 2015 featured book: Troubleshooting: Just the Facts
http://www.troubleshooters.com/tjust