Le 03/08/2015 19:23, Steve Litt a écrit :
> On Mon, 03 Aug 2015 16:00:27 +0200
> Didier Kryn <kryn@???> wrote:
>
>> Devuan is not opposed to kdbus, nor even to systemd. People here
>> want the freedom to not use systemd; they don't deny others the right
>> to use it, nor to use kdbus.
> Devuan was created out of a dislike of systemd. When you say "People
> here want the freedom to not use systemd; they don't deny others the
> right", we're not going to deliberately and maliciously put booby traps
> against systemd in Devuan.
>
> But I hope neither you nor others interpret this as our spending a
> microsecond of development time making systemd use easier. Nor that we
> add even one config option to ease use of systemd. I hope nobody is
> suggesting that we in the slightest inconvenience a normal Devuan user
> to accommodate this hypothetical person who wants to put systemd on
> Devuan, instead of using Debian.
>
> There are probably 30 official major binary distributions[1] defaulting
> to systemd. There's 1 official major binary distribution defaulting to
> something else: Devuan. Devuan's priority must be to provide a
> sans-systemd OS, not diluted by the irrelevant "freedom" of installing
> systemd on it.
>
>
> [1] Manjaro-OpenRC is a tolerated Manjaro flavor, but Officially
> Manjaro is systemd.
>
>
> SteveT
>
I mean exactly the same thing a you :-)
I dare to add a comment.
Aldous Huxley is the author of a historic narrative "The devils of
Loudun". At the end, the author draws a moral wich summarizes like this:
If you ever try to fight the devil head-on, it always turn on that
you play in his favour. The only way to actually fight the bad is to do
the good.
Cheers.
Didier
::
Re: [DNG] Unmingling kdbus and the …
