On Wed, Jun 03, 2015 at 08:37:22PM +1200, Daniel Reurich wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I'd like a straw poll on whether we should include non-free firmware in our
> installers by default.
>
> It's a deviation from Debians traditional position, but a pragmatic one that
> shows we care about the end users.
>
> Keen for feedback.

Maybe we can think about having 2 images for every iso/installer, the
default onw as usual without any non-free package, and another one,
under a non-free directory structure with some large readme, with
non-free drivers bundled. This should not be a so huge additional
effort, and will give even more freedom of choice.

--

Franco (nextime) Lanza
Lonate Pozzolo (VA) - Italy
SIP://casa@???
web: http://www.nexlab.net

NO TCPA: http://www.no1984.org
you can download my public key at:
http://danex.nexlab.it/nextime.asc || Key Servers
Key ID = D6132D50
Key fingerprint = 66ED 5211 9D59 DA53 1DF7 4189 DFED F580 D613 2D50
-----------------------------------
echo 16i[q]sa[ln0=aln100%Pln100/snlbx]sbA0D212153574F444E49572045535520454D20454B414D204F54204847554F4E452059415020544F4E4E4143205345544147204C4C4942snlbxq | dc
-----------------------------------