On 28/05/2015 11:43, Didier Kryn wrote:
> porting to Musl was not finished yet - still problems
> with dynamic linking he says. I prefer Musl to uClibc for several
> reasons

I'm using musl too. You can use the Aboriginal toolchains, even if
they're uClibc-based, to compile musl, and then link stuff against musl.
It just requires tweaking the musl-gcc.specs file a bit. More details
offline if you want!


> finally bootstrapped my toolchain from
> https://github.com/sabotage-linux/sabotage . But, even in Sabotage,
> the compiler is not sysrooted :-(

Yeah, I tried Sabotage too, and it's good, but I prefer the Aboriginal
toolchains, for this reason and other ones (for instance, a fully
static toolchain is much more elegant and easy to move around).

--
Laurent