KatolaZ wrote:
> On Tue, May 05, 2015 at 03:53:55PM -0400, Miles Fidelman wrote:
>
> [cut]
>
>>> Unfortunately, systemd has been *designed* to be unpluggable, and to
>>> munch as much as possible of the low-level userspace. We should live
>>> with it, especially because the typical answer you get about systemd
>>> compatibility issues is "it's not our problem. We won't fix it". I
>>> also have my personal (conspiracy) theory about why it is like that,
>>> which I am sure you don't want to hear....
>>>
>> Don't you mean "we should live WITHOUT it?"
>>
> I meant "we should live with the fact that systemd is not unpluggable"
> :)

Nicely put. But do you draw any implication from that vis-a-vis
supporting systemd in Devuan? (I certainly do :-)

Cheers,

Miles


--
In theory, there is no difference between theory and practice.
In practice, there is. .... Yogi Berra