:: Re: [Dng] acpi and systemd
Top Page
Delete this message
Reply to this message
Author: James Powell
Date:  
To: Hendrik Boom, dng@lists.dyne.org
Subject: Re: [Dng] acpi and systemd
Having watched other systems transitioning to systemd, I wouldn't be surprised if they did, or the projects get pushed into forced deprecation as ConsoleKit did before it was revived.

-Jim

> Date: Wed, 29 Apr 2015 08:19:25 -0400
> From: hendrik@???
> To: dng@???
> Subject: Re: [Dng] acpi and systemd
>
> On Sun, Apr 26, 2015 at 12:31:16AM +0200, Franco Lanza wrote:
> > On Sat, Apr 25, 2015 at 05:16:42PM -0400, Hendrik Boom wrote:
> > >
> > > acpid and acpi-support-base have already been removed from tasksel.
> >
> >
> > We already forked tasksel, so, it should not be an issue for us as long
> > as those two packages are maintained, or we will need to fork both acpid
> > and acpi-support-base too.
>
> Indeed. Is there a mechanism in place to watch for this kind of thing?
> Should there be?
>
> There might be a lot of packages dropped if Debian decides that systemd
> supplants or conflicts with them,
>
> -- hendrik
> _______________________________________________
> Dng mailing list
> Dng@???
> https://mailinglists.dyne.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dng