:: Re: [Dng] [OT] Debian problems with…
Top Page
This message is part of the following thread:
M-\the complete thread tree sorted by date
M.MKatolaZ at <-
M\KatolaZ at ->
Delete this message
Reply to this message
Author: Didier Kryn
Date:  
To: Hendrik Boom, dng
Subject: Re: [Dng] [OT] Debian problems with Jesse - was simple backgrounds

Le 02/03/2015 16:40, Hendrik Boom a écrit :
>> >Frankly, I've also believe that
>> >interpreted languages should never be used for anything other than a
>> >teaching tool.
> There's one huge advantage of interpreted languages: The code you see in
> the editor*is* the code you are running. No compiler to leave an
> obsolete executable around that you might be executing instead. 

     I consider weakly typed, or even non-typed languages should *never* 
be used for teaching. Unless one intends to teach loose programming.


     Yet I agree interpreted languages are convenient for small things, 
precisely because they are interpreted. Conveniency also include fast 
development and architecture-independant packaging.


     Didier


This message was posted to the following mailing lists:
dng
Mailing List Info | Nearby Messages		<-Re: [Dng] [OT] Debian problems with Jesse - was simple backgroundsRe: [Dng] [OT] Debian problems with Jesse - was simple backgrounds->

Donate to Dyne.org

dyne.org open discussions
administrated by dyne.org hackers		Lurker (version 2.3)