:: Re: [Dng] pre alpha valentine (secr…
Top Page
Delete this message
Reply to this message
Author: Steve Litt
Date:  
To: dng
Subject: Re: [Dng] pre alpha valentine (secret love declaration)
On Tue, 17 Feb 2015 16:41:12 -0500
Neo Futur <dng@???> wrote:

> > Nate, could you please summarize Luke's question? I haven't been
> > able to completely read any of his posts.
> its more than just a question, but you probably want :
>
> https://lists.debian.org/debian-user/2015/02/msg00695.html


The preceding link covers as much territory as the Roman Empire. Nate
asked the following:

=================================================
And yet I find it telling that none has so far answered Luke's question
as to why they are not bothered about the recent changes and direction
as he is. Was it bad for me to presume that no one would answer?
=================================================

So I ask *which* recent changes and direction? Systemd? Everyone's
spoken on their reasons for hating that. Monolithic entanglement and
complexification in general? Many have stated their exact reasons for
disliking those. Not having libsystemd0 load dynamically, and more
importantly having upstreams treat it as optional? The NSA/libselinux1
thing? Something else?

By the way, note to Luke: Your stuff would be *much* easier to read if
you used normal capitalization. Personally, I find it much harder to
read text, especially long text, when my only parse point is
separating by periods.

SteveT

Steve Litt                *  http://www.troubleshooters.com/
Troubleshooting Training  *  Human Performance