Hi everyone,
I have a proposal (sorry, bit long):
1. Please have a look at this PDF : A simple chart (logo + font + colors)
# http://albancrommer.github.io/devuan/Logo.pdf
2. Then browse to an example homepage designed with that chart, showing
the imaginary release Jabbah (astronomical name with same initial than
Jessie)
# http://albancrommer.github.io/devuan/
So, as a general approach, I tried to design these documents along the
following rules :
# Make it remind of Debian's spirit in a strong yet subtle manner
# Make it strong and determined
# Make it clean & professional: we're potentially speaking large
servers infrastructures, including sheepish managers you'll need to
convince ;)
# Make it ready for international support. At the very least,
support all european accentuated chars, but more is better.
# Make it easy to use for everyone while keeping a visual unity
# Make it work for all supports : black & white / grey / colour, web
& paper
# Give it a scientific touch. Choices made base on reasons not
passions. A focus on knowledge and not febrile mood swings :)
I hope these ideas will generally help everyone on the way to a better
distro.
This is an "unfinished" work, thanks for your feedback. Here's what IRC
said about it today:
*<?SylvieLorxu?>?? I'd personally make the logo a bit more colourful,
but it's definitely the best suggestion so far. I'm not a fan of the
webpage for the simple fact that it's 2014, yet it's not responsive :P**
**??*/ @SylvieLorxu, yes I can understand. Color : more work and
"serious" but ok. responsive : more work :)//
///*
*/*<?Fluor?> as a lurker here, i think it's one of the nicer logos so
far. yet, as a lurker, i am amazed by the fact we're fussing a*bout
logos and release names, so i'll retreat into the shadows and lurk.//
// ?///@/FluorFussing about the "surface" : true that, but as a
lurker too, that part is important as an element of trust//
/
As a final point, there is a repository for the proposal and structured
feedback
#
https://github.com/albancrommer/devuan
As soon as I consider the work "ready", discussion included, I go wiki ;)
Cheers,
a:
PS: I know github.com is not free. It was practical as a dev amongst
devs, yet things can move :)
Le 17/12/2014 17:41, Jim Murphy a écrit :
> On Tue, Dec 16, 2014 at 10:56 PM, Noel Torres <envite@???> wrote:
>> On Monday, 15 de December de 2014 15:47:06 Hendrik Boom escribió:
>> But which language to use for names of thos astronomical objects?
>>
>> This is why I like so much the idea of ancient sites. Each on its own natural
>> language.
>>
>> Regards
>>
>> Noel
>> er Envite
>>
> I really do like the idea of ancient sites, but I believe it has the same
> issue as astronomical objects -- which language?
>
> Just look at Machu Picchu(hispanicized spelling) in Peru, or do we use
> Machu Pikchu(Quechua). The Inca people had no written language,
> so we are using characters from one of the latin alphabet variants here.
> If we used an ancient Egyptian site, would we use Egyptian hieroglyphs
> (uniliterals)? I believe you can see where this could be leading us.
>
> I still very much like the idea, but I am a bit confused by the term
> "natural language". Did I misunderstand what you were trying to say?
>
> BTW, astronomical objects would be my second choice.
>
> Jim "Friartek"
> _______________________________________________
> Dng mailing list
> Dng@???
> https://mailinglists.dyne.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dng