On Mon, Dec 01, 2014 at 08:03:12AM +0000, Gregory Smith wrote:
> Debian claimed that systemd wouldn't be forced, you always could use
> init, same sort of message. That was a lie and we knew it from the
> start.
>
> There needs to be a strong message sent.
>

They lie. We don't.

They mean "you can choose (for the moment) to use another init as pid 1,
but you will have a lot of shit from systemd even if you use another
init. And then in future this will be probably false again, and you will
forced to use systemd in init 1."

We mean "maybe, if we can, we will offer also the option to use systemd,
but only if this mean that we can work even without anything from it. In
any case, you can be sure that you can run a system completely systemd
free, nor only from pid 1, but from the whole system".

Find the differences.

--

Franco Lanza
My blog: http://www.nexlab.it
email: nextime@???
Fax/Tel: +39 0331 682151
Cell: +39 339 8125940
Lonate Pozzolo (VA) - Italy
-----------------------------------
NO TCPA: http://www.no1984.org
you can download my public key at:
http://danex.nexlab.it/nextime.asc || Key Servers
Key ID = D6132D50
Key fingerprint = 66ED 5211 9D59 DA53 1DF7 4189 DFED F580 D613 2D50
-----------------------------------
echo 16i[q]sa[ln0=aln100%Pln100/snlbx]sbA0D212153574F444E49572045535520454D20454B414D204F54204847554F4E452059415020544F4E4E4143205345544147204C4C4942snlbxq | dc
-----------------------------------