Seconded.

"But for all fleeing systemd, it's a bit problematic to hear the talk
about integrationg systemd again. It'd do the project good to place a
"political" message to make things clear. It's not good to hear that
maybe you'lll get backstabed by systemd again (just overstressing)"

Debian claimed that systemd wouldn't be forced, you always could use
init, same sort of message. That was a lie and we knew it from the
start.

There needs to be a strong message sent.

On 12/1/14, Dr. Nikolaus Klepp <dr.klepp@???> wrote:
> Am Montag, 1. Dezember 2014 schrieb Franco Lanza:
>> On Mon, Dec 01, 2014 at 08:36:12AM +0100, Nikolaus Klepp wrote:
>> >
>> > Well, how many people do you have to divert your efforts on systemd and
>> > sysv?
>> >
>>
>> You mean how many people we are in total? more than we expect
>> considering how many are offering to help.
>
> Good to hear - I for myself have fled to FreeBSD for now :-)
>
>> How many people are willing to work on systemd? i bet no one actually.
>> But this isn't the point of the differentiation between
>> philosophy and doability.
>
> I meant the more pragmatic aproach: If there are peaople willing to work on
> systemd, they probably won't join this project. But for all fleeing systemd,
> it's a bit problematic to hear the talk about integrationg systemd again.
> It'd do the project good to place a "political" message to make things
> clear. It's not good to hear that maybe you'lll get backstabed by systemd
> again (just overstressing)
>
> Nik
>
>
>
>
> --
> Please do not email me anything that you are not comfortable also sharing
> with the NSA.
> _______________________________________________
> Dng mailing list
> Dng@???
> https://mailinglists.dyne.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dng
>