2014-05-25 12:37 GMT-05:00 Thomas Hartman <thomas@???>:
> What does GW stand for?
>
> I don't find chains.com api model unreasonable at all. This blockchain
>
> infrastructure is definitely a weak spot. Blockchain.info does a lot,
> but it doesn't do it all, and it's not open source. Obelisk does
> more, but is unreliable and requires expensive hardware.
>
> I am focusing my efforts around bitcore insight currently.
>
> Equally important than building these tools, I hope there is an effort
> to raise the semantic bar around all of them.
>
> Electrum wallets should be compatible with multibit, should be
> compatible with satoshi.
>
> Components for all these wallets that talk to the blockchain should be
> easily switchable between obelisk, insight, bitcoind, where the
> relevant index/db are shared.
>
> There is a lot of duplication of effort currently. I see this when I
> look at te foundation bitcoind satoshi issues on github, and compare
> it with the sx stuff I have been working on.
>
> Same goes for the blockchain back ends.
>
> Yes, it is hard to build bitcoin apps currently, and ad hoc queries to
> the blockchain are the bottleneck.
>
> Don't make fun of chains.com IPO. They're not dummies.
>
> Recognize that they are going for the jugular, and that keeping things
> open is not going to happen without effort and working smart.
> Otherwise proprietary will take the cream, and everything else is half
> assed.
>
>
>
>
>
>
> On Sun, May 25, 2014 at 3:16 AM, Amir Taaki <genjix@???> wrote:
> > hahahahahaha zodman oh wow
> > don't know whether to laugh or cry, what a crazy world
> >
> > On 05/25/2014 06:36 AM, Andres Vargas - zodman wrote:
> >>
> http://www.coindesk.com/chains-api-takes-hard-work-bitcoin-app-development/ > >>
> >> I this article explains chain.com <http://chain.com> company
> implement
> >> a bitcoin api rest and some venture capital invested on theirs $4.2M USD
> >>
> >>
> >> Wait a moment we had all of that on the GW.
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> --
> >> Andres Vargas
> >> www.zodman.com.mx <http://www.zodman.com.mx>
> >>
> >>
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> unSYSTEM mailing list: http://unsystem.net > >> https://mailinglists.dyne.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/unsystem > >>
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > unSYSTEM mailing list: http://unsystem.net > > https://mailinglists.dyne.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/unsystem > >
> _______________________________________________
> unSYSTEM mailing list: http://unsystem.net > https://mailinglists.dyne.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/unsystem >
::
Re: [unSYSTEM] the gw of darkwallet…
