Foremost I like their goal of making it easier for people to start
working on bitcoin applications, but then they quote something like

“I felt like I’d enter the weekend with a really great idea [for an
application] but I’d spend three weekends just trying to get these
[bitcoin] nodes running in a way that was useful for my application.”

It's really too bad they're investing all that money in builiding yet
another in-the-cloud service, instead of in making the P2P tools
easier to use in the first place.

All - I guess? - because they need to build toll gates and 'own'
infrastructure to monetize on it. Which in turn creates structural
risk because everyone will rely on their information and servers. I
think people will eventually realize that the old way just doesn't
work here anymore.

Wladimir

On Sun, May 25, 2014 at 12:16 PM, Amir Taaki <genjix@???> wrote:
> hahahahahaha zodman oh wow
> don't know whether to laugh or cry, what a crazy world
>
> On 05/25/2014 06:36 AM, Andres Vargas - zodman wrote:
>> http://www.coindesk.com/chains-api-takes-hard-work-bitcoin-app-development/
>>
>> I this article explains chain.com <http://chain.com> company implement
>> a bitcoin api rest and some venture capital invested on theirs $4.2M USD
>>
>>
>> Wait a moment we had all of that on the GW.
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Andres Vargas
>> www.zodman.com.mx <http://www.zodman.com.mx>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> unSYSTEM mailing list: http://unsystem.net
>> https://mailinglists.dyne.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/unsystem
>>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> unSYSTEM mailing list: http://unsystem.net
> https://mailinglists.dyne.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/unsystem
>