:: Re: [unSYSTEM] Foundation funding f…
Top Page
This message is part of the following thread:
Mthe complete thread tree sorted by date
M--++-\MAmir Taaki at <-
M+\MM\M 
Delete this message
Reply to this message
Author: Peter Todd
Date:  
To: System undo crew
Subject: Re: [unSYSTEM] Foundation funding for Dark Wallet (Was: Don't mix because of taint + comments ...)


On 22 May 2014 19:54:30 GMT+03:00, Andrew Miller <amiller@???> wrote:

>I think DarkWallet (or something related in similar spirit) should
>submit a
>grant proposal (and resubmit it every quarter if necessary!)

I agree. If they turn you down its valuable evidence that they don't value privacy and fungibility, evidence that can be taken to the public. If they accept, well, as long as Amir is in charge I have no worries about conflicts of interest.


This message was posted to the following mailing lists:
unSystem
Mailing List Info | Nearby Messages		<-Re: [unSYSTEM] Foundation funding for Dark Wallet (Was: Don't mix because of taint + comments ...)Re: [unSYSTEM] Uber threatening cushty taxi drivers monopoly while they cry "who will protect the passengers!"->

Donate to Dyne.org

dyne.org open discussions
administrated by dyne.org hackers		Lurker (version 2.3)