>     Feature request at

>     https://github.com/spesmilo/sx/issues/72

>     On Wed, May 14, 2014 at 8:40 AM, Thomas Hartman
>     <thomas@??? <mailto:thomas@standardcrypto.com>> wrote:

>         I suppose I would go with

>         sx --network=testnet3

>         Backwards compaible, with mainnet the default.

>         I would target getting sx working with testnet without
>         recompiling, before targetting sx for altcoins. I think it
>         encompasses a lot of the same issues, but more tractably.

>         On Wed, May 14, 2014 at 7:41 AM, Eric Voskuil <eric@???
>         <mailto:eric@voskuil.org>> wrote:

>             The testnet option is compiled into libbitcoin, an sx
>             dependency. It would be nice for this to instead be
>             configurable.

>             e

>             On May 14, 2014, at 7:28 AM, Thomas Hartman
>             <thomas@???
>             <mailto:thomas@standardcrypto.com>> wrote:

>>             I suppose 

>>             sx --currency=litecoin

>>             with bitcoin default might work. This would be backwards
>>             compatible.

>>             That being said, to me, this is only a really attractive
>>             option if all the currency-specific code can be specified
>>             in an config file that is read at compile time.

>>             I suppose this would be things like the genesis block, and
>>             scrypt vs sha.

>>             Perhaps a similar mechanism could also be used to control
>>             whether testnet or mainnet is specified. 

>>             Maybe there is a way to distinguish testnet/mainnet with
>>             sx already but I couldn't figure it out.

>>             On Wed, May 14, 2014 at 6:26 AM, mlmikael
>>             <mlmikael@???
>>             <mailto:mlmikael@openmailbox.org>> wrote:

>>                 /LICENSE , I missed the meaning of rows 31-34 from
>>                 being stuck at rows 7, 17, 19 and lost among the
>>                 OpenSSL exception etc.

>>                 If I'd have read the word "lesser" on /README row 2
>>                 first it I should have had the context not to miss that.

>>                 LGPL for Debian devs, ok - it's like, Debian prefers
>>                 LGPL packages for some reasons so therefore consider
>>                 relicense for everyone?

>>                 Ok very well, now to practical priorities. Just in
>>                 case you have any new thoughts on Litecoin feel free
>>                 to tell.

>>                 How different do you feel they are with regard to
>>                 console use, will LibBitcoin operations for Litecoin
>>                 be done using "sx -l" or by a new "lx"?

>>                 On 2014-05-13 23:04, Amir Taaki wrote:

>>                     yep, let me know where I can add this for clarity.
>>                     Where did you look
>>                     first? The README?

>>                     BTW I might change the license to vanilla LGPL for
>>                     Debian devs, but not
>>                     before discussing with others here first. Thanks
>>                     for all your input.

>>                 _________________________________________________
>>                 Libbitcoin mailing list
>>                 Libbitcoin@???
>>                 <mailto:Libbitcoin@lists.dyne.org>
>>                 https://mailinglists.dyne.org/__cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/__libbitcoin
>>                 <https://mailinglists.dyne.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/libbitcoin>

>>             _______________________________________________
>>             Libbitcoin mailing list
>>             Libbitcoin@??? <mailto:Libbitcoin@lists.dyne.org>
>>             https://mailinglists.dyne.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/libbitcoin