>>     /LICENSE , I missed the meaning of rows 31-34 from being stuck at
>>     rows 7, 17, 19 and lost among the OpenSSL exception etc.

>>     If I'd have read the word "lesser" on /README row 2 first it I
>>     should have had the context not to miss that.

>>     LGPL for Debian devs, ok - it's like, Debian prefers LGPL packages
>>     for some reasons so therefore consider relicense for everyone?

>>     Ok very well, now to practical priorities. Just in case you have
>>     any new thoughts on Litecoin feel free to tell.

>>     How different do you feel they are with regard to console use,
>>     will LibBitcoin operations for Litecoin be done using "sx -l" or
>>     by a new "lx"?

>>     On 2014-05-13 23:04, Amir Taaki wrote:

>>         yep, let me know where I can add this for clarity. Where did
>>         you look
>>         first? The README?

>>         BTW I might change the license to vanilla LGPL for Debian
>>         devs, but not
>>         before discussing with others here first. Thanks for all your
>>         input.

>>     _________________________________________________
>>     Libbitcoin mailing list
>>     Libbitcoin@??? <mailto:Libbitcoin@lists.dyne.org>
>>     https://mailinglists.dyne.org/__cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/__libbitcoin
>>     <https://mailinglists.dyne.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/libbitcoin>