/LICENSE , I missed the meaning of rows 31-34 from being stuck at rows
7, 17, 19 and lost among the OpenSSL exception etc.

If I'd have read the word "lesser" on /README row 2 first it I should
have had the context not to miss that.


LGPL for Debian devs, ok - it's like, Debian prefers LGPL packages for
some reasons so therefore consider relicense for everyone?



Ok very well, now to practical priorities. Just in case you have any new
thoughts on Litecoin feel free to tell.

How different do you feel they are with regard to console use, will
LibBitcoin operations for Litecoin be done using "sx -l" or by a new
"lx"?

On 2014-05-13 23:04, Amir Taaki wrote:
> yep, let me know where I can add this for clarity. Where did you look
> first? The README?
>
> BTW I might change the license to vanilla LGPL for Debian devs, but not
> before discussing with others here first. Thanks for all your input.
>