yep, let me know where I can add this for clarity. Where did you look
first? The README?

BTW I might change the license to vanilla LGPL for Debian devs, but not
before discussing with others here first. Thanks for all your input.

On 13/05/14 22:45, mlmikael wrote:
> Amir,
>
> Aha, awesomeness, thank you very much for clarifying!
>
>
> So my email was out of having gotten lost in the LICENSE file's
> phrasing, sorry. Very well, I hope this thread will clarify it for
> anyone else who'd be running into the same question another day.
>
>
> This exact phrasing is used in many projects to get an Affero LGPLv3+
> effect - neat!
>
> http://mo.morsi.org/blog/node/270 would be one place that reflects it.
> Just in case you happen to recall the even more original source you got
> it from, feel free to share.
>
>
> Last, this has been to clarify the rules of the game only which is a
> really valuable thing.
>
> On 2014-05-13 22:14, Amir Taaki wrote:
>> libbitcoin is with a lesser clause.
>> Added by SFLC and vetted by Stallman himself:
>> https://github.com/libbitcoin/libbitcoin/blob/develop/LICENSE#L31
>
>