:: Re: [unSYSTEM] Where are all the wo…
Top Page
Delete this message
Reply to this message
Author: Thomas Hartman
Date:  
To: System undo crew
Subject: Re: [unSYSTEM] Where are all the women in Bitcoin? Here they are!
I think also ridicule works better than outrage.

It is also a lot meaner though.

Powerful weapons should be used wisely.

Once wielded, they don't go back in the sheath on the battle field.



On Wed, Jan 29, 2014 at 9:26 PM, Aimee Maree <aimee@???> wrote:
> I can introduce you to one? I can also introduce you to non blind ones and
> ones who are kernel contributors
>
> Sent from my iPhone
>
> On 30 Jan 2014, at 3:48 pm, Jonathan James Harrison
> <jonathanjamesharrison@???> wrote:
>
> What on earth are you talking about? Blind hermaphrodites???!!!
>
> Not sure they would make the best booth babes tbh
>
> On Thursday, 30 January 2014, Aimee Maree <aimee@???> wrote:
>>
>> not everyone has eyes in their head some use their ears as their eyes do
>> not work... Some are born with no gender or both genders... It is the most
>> limiting concept in society... that's a red pill we should all
>> acknowledge humans made gender to nature there is no separation...
>>
>> anyways and anywho ;)
>>
>>
>>
>> On 30 Jan 2014, at 3:23 pm, Cody R Wilson <codywilson@???> wrote:
>>
>> Just stopped by for team red pill. There is more wisdom in your body than
>> in your deepest philosophy.
>>
>> The sexual market has laws we acknowledge with our eyes and minds despite
>> our most furious protests otherwise.
>>
>> On Jan 29, 2014 10:08 PM, "Elizabeth Ploshay"
>> <elizabeth@???> wrote:
>>>
>>> Patrick, great point there. Agreed!
>>>
>>> Elizabeth T. Ploshay
>>> elizabeth@???
>>> Manager of Communications
>>> Bitcoin Magazine
>>> elizabethtploshay.com
>>>
>>>
>>> On Wed, Jan 29, 2014 at 11:03 PM, Robert Jakob <rsjakob@???> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> I just think that was the point he was trying to make.
>>>>
>>>> -Robert
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Wed, Jan 29, 2014 at 9:45 PM, Patrick Murck
>>>> <patrick@???> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> This is just my personal take on the "booth babe" thing. If you want to
>>>>> trot out booth babes all you have accomplished is signaling to me that:
>>>>>
>>>>> 1) You don't believe in your product/service/value proposition
>>>>> 2) You have poor taste and judgment
>>>>> 3) And I won't be stopping by your booth for a sales pitch
>>>>>
>>>>> But hey, knock yourself out.
>>>>>
>>>>> --PM
>>>>>
>>>>> On January 29, 2014 at 10:42:12 PM, Jonathan James Harrison
>>>>> (jonathanjamesharrison@???) wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> What about toilet cleaners at exhibitions they are objectified as
>>>>> sanitation machines.
>>>>> Booth babes know they are being objectified and get paid well to be
>>>>> objectified.
>>>>> Many men like to look at sexually attractive women which is very
>>>>> natural.
>>>>> Booth babes can be great for promotions.
>>>>> Nice thing about bitcoin is you can set up a company anonymously and if
>>>>> you do that as women you know that there will be absolutely no
>>>>> discrimination against you.
>>>>> Satoshi maybe a black Serbian lesbian for all we know.
>>>>>
>>>>> On Thursday, 30 January 2014, Aimee Maree <aimee@???> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> When performing surveys it is one of the number 1 reasons women don't
>>>>> attend tech conferences... So diversity is affected
>>>>>
>>>>> So booth babes are not about allowing women to be women it's about
>>>>> objectification which is wrong for men women and children oh and by the way
>>>>> those who are born with multi genders or a-sexual and animals etc we need to
>>>>> allow people to be themselves but we also need to allow minorities to feel
>>>>> comfortable if we are ever to change the rule of White Anglo men...
>>>>>
>>>>> So if you want sex you go to a sex shop that's all cool I'm fine with
>>>>> that I would like to see unions set up for prostitues personally however if
>>>>> I attend a tech conference I'm there for other reasons just like when I go
>>>>> to an underground party or when I attend a trans gender meet-up etc etc see
>>>>> my point here is horses for courses in regards to the booth babes
>>>>>
>>>>> Anyway these are just some points no way are they saying change your
>>>>> mind but just hey this is what the people who attend your conferences say
>>>>> and I personally would never attend a conference with a booth babe I have
>>>>> had enough problems being a technical women in IT let alone to be in a room
>>>>> where my gender is subjectified. So you can have your booth babes but a high
>>>>> number of women won't be at your conferences and you will sending a message
>>>>> to young girls sorry in IT your still seen as a joke!
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Anyways just some thoughts?
>>>>>
>>>>> On 30 Jan 2014, at 1:38 pm, Robert Jakob <rsjakob@???> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> That being said, there is a point to be made. I think "booth babes"
>>>>> are rather harmless. That kind of superficial lust can snowball into worse
>>>>> things like prostitution, sexual slaver, child marriages, etc... It's like
>>>>> the symptom of a deeper sickness. However, when you start down that path of
>>>>> dictating how a person should live, or act, or dress, or what kind of
>>>>> personality they should have, it becomes a slippery slope. It becomes a new
>>>>> disease. The whole reason we are all anti-establishment in the first place.
>>>>> If you infringe on another's right to be free and express themselves in any
>>>>> way that makes them happy, you become the oppressor.
>>>>>
>>>>> So I do agree with both sides of the argument. I abhor the
>>>>> objectification of human beings, and the superficial, and the materialistic,
>>>>> but I also believe free-will is the most fundamental human right.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On Wed, Jan 29, 2014 at 8:18 PM, Anthony D'Onofrio
>>>>> <iamtexture@???> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> --------------------
>>>>> Patrick Murck
>>>>> General Counsel
>>>>>
>>>>> <pt_2060_1947_o.jpg>
>>>>>
>>>>> patrick@???
>>>>> 703.608.8864
>>>>>
>>>>> @virtuallylaw
>>>>> http://www.linkedin.com/in/patrickmurck
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>>>
>>>>> This message is intended to be confidential and may be legally
>>>>> privileged. It is intended solely for the addressee. If you are not the
>>>>> intended recipient, please delete this message from your system and notify
>>>>> me immediately. Any disclosure, copying, distribution or action taken or
>>>>> omitted to be taken by an unintended recipient in reliance on this message
>>>>> is prohibited and may be unlawful.
>>>>>
>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>> unSYSTEM mailing list: http://unsystem.net
>>>>> https://mailinglists.dyne.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/unsystem
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> unSYSTEM mailing list: http://unsystem.net
>>>> https://mailinglists.dyne.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/unsystem
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> unSYSTEM mailing list: http://unsystem.net
>>> https://mailinglists.dyne.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/unsystem
>>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> unSYSTEM mailing list: http://unsystem.net
>> https://mailinglists.dyne.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/unsystem
>
> _______________________________________________
> unSYSTEM mailing list: http://unsystem.net
> https://mailinglists.dyne.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/unsystem
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> unSYSTEM mailing list: http://unsystem.net
> https://mailinglists.dyne.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/unsystem
>