On Fri, 24 May 2013, Felipe Fonseca wrote:

> I think it's also worth asking whether or not it is actually an
> "option", and how persistent it is. Do I call myself brico? When,
> with whom, against which alternatives? Am I more brico than
> metareciclagem? Or both? Or none?
>
> Identities, multiplicities, belonging, building...

I think the question on how one has arrived is wrong, with all respect
for J&J doing lots of very good stuff and the BRICO reader being just a
great thing.. I'm not interested in this social-network approach of
understanding how things are born, there is no actual value in the
origin of things if not the projection of the one-self which is an
individualist archetipe per-se.

What InI is interested is the process, not the origin. Is a fertile
present, not a crystallized amber past. Is the affluent community, not
the founding members. Is the story, not the history. Is how to make
peace, not who started the war.

ciao