:: Re: [dyne:bolic] NEW Release: dyne:…
Top Page
Delete this message
Reply to this message
Author: Hal
Date:  
To: dynebolic mailinglist
Subject: Re: [dyne:bolic] NEW Release: dyne:bolic 3.0.0 codename MUNIR
the linux revision for the kernel numbers use odd and even as stable
and unstable
thus 3.99.808 would be unstable, and 3.98.909 would be stable

worth including?
x

On Fri, Sep 9, 2011 at 12:40 PM, Jaromil <jaromil@???> wrote:
>
> re all,
>
> On Thu, 08 Sep 2011, Lisandro Peralta wrote:
>
>> dude.. is it beta yet? i've downloaded it and it says beta...
>
> ok let me explain. if you remember with dyne:bolic 2 we've had many
> releases following the first major:
>
> 2.3.0 ,  2.3.1 ,  2.3.2
>
> 2.5.0 ,  2.5.1 ,  2.5.2
>
> etc.
>
> lets label this numbers now, for example in 2.5.1:
>
>  2 - MAJOR release version (like in dyne:II), now is 3 :)
>
>  5 - BUILD release version (which now is 0)
>
>  1 - BUGFIX release version
>
> historically for us the change of the BUGFIX number on the right side
> was always a quick fix, thanks to the feedback given by you :)
>
> the BUILD number was always someone a new recompilation of core
> libraries and a somehow more relevant upgrade of functionalities on
> top of the same MAJOR core.
>
> now we will follow the same scheme, but we will tag as "beta" every
> release which is not the last one of the BUILD versions.
>
> This means that I'm expecting to receive some feedback - please do! :)
> and then make fixes which will lead to the next 3.0.1 release.  When
> the 3.0.x will be done and it won't be interesting to update it
> anymore, that will be tagged stable, lets say it can be the 3.0.1 or
> 3.0.2 or even the 3.0.0 if there are no bugs - can't believe it! ;)
>
> why this? because at every new BUILD then new bugs can come in the
> distribution and we need to warn people wanting to publish dyne:bolic
> around if it is a well tested build or not.
>
> said that, i think another reason is that BETA is a state of mind :)
> as the poetess Diane di Prima used to say... we are unfinished :)
> in other words... in the same river flow, we are and we are not :)
>
>
> ahahah
>
> ciao
>
>
> --
> jaromil,  dyne.org developer,  http://jaromil.dyne.org
> GPG: B2D9 9376 BFB2 60B7 601F 5B62 F6D3 FBD9 C2B6 8E39
> _______________________________________________
> dynebolic mailing list
> dynebolic@???
> http://lists.dyne.org/mailman/listinfo/dynebolic
>