David,

For political reasons a couple of people want to turn this into a personal
matter and divert attention away from the issue. I've heard about this
happening a lot on other Linux projects, but I won't be diverted. This
thread is about:

1) Dyne not having Rosegarden;
2) PureData being taken out of, or needing custom modules for, Dyne;
3) Blender being too hard to use (although someone else has claimed to use
it successfully).

I agree with you 100% and I'm not "on message" with the backslapping.
Something needs to be done to fix Dyne for the benefit of ordinary users.

Jaromil's comments can be rationalised, for he is no longer in sole charge
of this project and I am pretty sure others in his team will be more open to
suggestions.

Regards,

Max

On 3/24/07, David Baron <d_baron@???> wrote:
>
> My two cents:
>
> 1. Please, cut the foul language.
>
> 2. Blender is incomprehensible. Too bad since this is one of the only
> opensource programs that can make stuff for flightgear and I would love to
> help make New York look like New York :-)
>
> 3. Dyne is great! I have all the stuff on my Debien box but being able to
> pop
> in a CD and use that mobily is of great potential.
> _______________________________________________
> dynebolic mailing list
> dynebolic@???
> http://lists.dyne.org/mailman/listinfo/dynebolic
>