:: [DNG] ..somewhat OnTopic, was: OT:…
Página Inicial
Delete this message
Reply to this message
Autor: Arnt Karlsen
Data:  
Para: dng
Tópicos Antigos: Re: [DNG] OT: OT ??
Assunto: [DNG] ..somewhat OnTopic, was: OT: OT ??
On Tue, 4 Feb 2025 17:30:44 +0100, Didier wrote in message
<7cb77633-0a55-4ed3-b68e-2b50cffcf6c8@???>:

> Le 04/02/2025 à 14:29, R A Montante, Ph.D. via Dng a écrit :
> > Tangential question:  When people write "OT", do they mean
> > "On Topic" or "Off Topic"?  I'm never quite sure...
> >
>     I'd say that when a message is "on topic" it isn't worth to
> mention because it is obviously the default.


..respectfully disagreed, in "OT" threads I find (somewhat) OnTopic,
I say so in the Subject line, and explain why in the body, like here.

> I couldn't imagine a mailing list for which "off topic" would be the
> default. Therefore when there is a mention, it is for "off topic".


..down here, I agree. :o)

--
..med vennlig hilsen = with Kind Regards from Arnt Karlsen
...with a number of polar bear hunters in his ancestry...
Scenarios always come in sets of three:
best case, worst case, and just in case.