> >> Sysvinit's process controller is, IMHO, inferior to runit and s6
> >> because it requires daemons to background themselves, and its init
> >> scripts are huuuuuuuge. Systemd advocates would also include as a
> >> disadvantage that sysvinit's process controller can't fork processes
> >> in parallel. I don't think that's a significant disadvantage unless a
> >> daemon is incredibly slow in starting, in which case, shame on the
> >> daemon or shame on the admin (if he botched reverse DNS, for
> >> instance).