:: [devuan-dev] bug#844: systemd-boot-…
トップ ページ
このメッセージを削除
このメッセージに返信
著者: murzik
日付:  
To: Mark Hindley
CC: 844
題目: [devuan-dev] bug#844: systemd-boot-efi: Broken man pages
Interesting. but it seems to me that adding a dependency on systemd
because of one (!!) documentation file will be a very strange decision.
this file will most likely be moved from the systemd package, or even
just a copy of it added to the package.
Also, I found an alternative - stubby
<https://github.com/puzzleos/stubby>.
so even if a dependency on systemd is added, it shouldn't cause any
inconvenience.
I'll report it to debian bug tracker later.

On Thu, Apr 4 2024 at 01:23:34 PM +11:00:00, murzik
<lorietta2023@???> wrote:
> Interesting. but it seems to me that adding a dependency on systemd
> because of one (!!) documentation file will be a very strange
> decision. this file will most likely be moved from the systemd
> package, or even just a copy of it added to the package.
> Also, I found an alternative - stubby core.
> so even if a dependency on systemd is added, it shouldn't cause any
> inconvenience
> Interesting. but it seems to me that adding a dependency on systemd
> because of one (!!) documentation file will be a very strange
> decision. this file will most likely be moved from the systemd
> package, or even just a copy of it added to the package.
> Also, I found an alternative - stubby core.
> so even if a dependency on systemd is added, it shouldn't cause any
> inconvenience
> Interesting. but it seems to me that adding a dependency on systemd
> because of one (!!) documentation file will be a very strange
> decision. this file will most likely be moved from the systemd
> package, or even just a copy of it added to the package.
> Also, I found an alternative - stubby core.
> so even if a dependency on systemd is added, it shouldn't cause any
> inconvenience
> Interesting. but it seems to me that adding a dependency on systemd
> because of one (!!) documentation file will be a very strange
> decision. this file will most likely be moved from the systemd
> package, or even just a copy of it added to the package.
> Also, I found an alternative - stubby
> https://github.com/puzzleos/stubby.
> so even if a dependency on systemd is added, it shouldn't cause any
> inconvenience.
> I'll report it to debian bug tracker later.
>
> On Wed, Apr 3 2024 at 01:11:15 PM +01:00:00, Mark Hindley 
> <mark@???> wrote:
>> On Wed, Apr 03, 2024 at 10:07:50PM +1100, murzik wrote:
>>>     As far as I can tell, the project has experience in this.
>>>     we already have systemd-bootchart; systmed-sysusers-standalone;
>>>     systemd-tpmfiles-standalone; systemd-oomd.. I don't think 
>>> adding one
>>>     standalone package will be a problem.

>>
>> All of those are Debian packages. Devuan doesn't produce any systemd
>> standalone packages.
>>
>> Mark