Hi Steve,

Steve Litt <slitt@???> writes:

> Hi all,
>
> I received this email today. If it's true, and if I understand it
> correctly, then the fix is definitely in. Debian seems to be going out
> of its way to make sure no non-systemd derivatives exist.

Did you bother to read the bug report?

Mark Hindley pushed a fix and closed the bug on 2023-12-26. The fixed
version is in unstable.

> At this point, I just have to wonder who's bribing whom, and with what.
> I could be wrong, but it seems to me that Debian has done more to
> sabotage usage of systemd than would be explained by laziness or
> anything else but some sort of conflict of interest.
>
> I know Debian is incompetent: Witness the usr merge fiasco. But I'm
> sorry, nobody's THAT stupid or THAT incompetent. I think there's
> motivation.
>
> SteveT
>
> ========================================
>
> Begin forwarded message:
>
>
>
> Date: Thu, 28 Dec 2023 04:39:10 +0000
> From: Debian testing autoremoval watch <noreply@???>
> To: elogind@???
> Subject: elogind is marked for autoremoval from testing
>
>
> elogind 252.9-1debian2 is marked for autoremoval from testing on
> 2024-01-17
>
> It is affected by these RC bugs:
> 1059028: elogind: elogind FTBFS with nocheck: missing mount dependency
> https://bugs.debian.org/1059028
>
>
>
> This mail is generated by:
> https://salsa.debian.org/release-team/release-tools/-/blob/master/mailer/mail_autoremovals.pl
>
> Autoremoval data is generated by:
> https://salsa.debian.org/qa/udd/-/blob/master/udd/testing_autoremovals_gatherer.pl
>
> _______________________________________________
> Dng mailing list
> Dng@???
> https://mailinglists.dyne.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dng


--
Olaf Meeuwissen