On 2023-11-25 04:08:44, Joel Roth via Dng wrote:
> On Sat, Nov 25, 2023 at 11:49:38PM +1000, onefang wrote:
> > Speaking of mutt, back in ASCII the mutt package was actually neomutt,
> > but neomutt got it's own package now. neomut is what I use, but I use
> > the ASCII version, coz of two bugs.
> >
> > Normally new emails are marked N, and you can mark emails as O. If
> > there's no N emails in a folider, it'll show you the first O one when you
> > enter the folder, then you can skip to the next O one. The bug is that
> > when you enter a folder the O's are shown as N, and act like them. NOt
> > that if you then go back to using the ASCII version, the O's are back as
> > they where.
> >
> > But the real killer bug - random emails are marked as "to be deleted"
> > sometimes. So you get a "Purge 6 emails?" question when you leave a
> > folder sometimes.
> >
> > I just tested the Daedalus version, it still has those bugs. So I'm
> > sticking with the ASCII version.
>
> Are your mails stored as mbox or Maildir?

Maildir

> I use mutt and do notice that I never see the O mark, only N.
> Am I correct to assume that my current muttrc won't work with neomutt?

If your current .muttrc is from the ASCII mutt, then it IS neomutt's
.muttrc, coz ASCII mutt is really neomutt. I dunno if they are
compatible, I've always used neomutt, even whan Debian called it mutt in
ASCII.

--
A big old stinking pile of genius that no one wants
coz there are too many silver coated monkeys in the world.