On Sun, 13 Aug 2023 19:59:17 -0400, Ken wrote in message
<855682fc-0442-803a-ff8e-c2c85453bee8@???>:

> On 8/13/23 15:47, Arnt Karlsen wrote:
> > On Sun, 13 Aug 2023 12:18:45 -0400, Ken wrote in message
> > <9dcd942a-c32e-04ec-8040-f8ee9b2c83cf@???>:
> >
> >> On 8/13/23 09:46, Antony Stone wrote:
> >>> On Sunday 13 August 2023 at 15:30:51, Ken Dibble wrote:
> >>>
> >>>> On 8/13/23 07:06, Antony Stone wrote:
> > ..snip.
> >
> >>>> kdibble@thinkstation:~/Downloads/src$ apt-get source
> >>>> linux-image-amd64=5.10.179-3
> >>>> E: Can not find version '5.10.179-3' of package
> >>>> 'linux-image-amd64'
> >>> Try using "178" instead of "179" :)
> >> How would asking for the source of 178-3 get me the source of
> >> 179-3?
> > ..you don't. ;o) You get 178-3. If you want 179-3 and are in
> > such an hurry, write it yourself, or write a nice fat cheque to
> > pay somebody to do it for you. Or, go take a nice long relaxing
> > hike until somebody really, really, really f***ing nice writes
> > you _a_ 179-3, all for free. By which time you might see a need
> > for a 179-4. ;o)
> >
> Stupid me. 

..you are not alone...

> I thought that since  5.10.179-3 was an official
> Debian/Devuan release

...relying as an anti-systemd distro like Devuan on a systemd-only
systemd advocacy "distro" organization (or "reality" TV show?)
like Debian, as upstream for anything critical, or, as source for
GPL etc source code, is IMNTHO, a very stupid idea.

..don't take my word as gospel here, try:
"aptitude install how-can-i-help ", then
"how-can-i-help >uh-oh ;less uh-oh" and then
"how-can-i-help --old >uh-oh-too ;less uh-oh-too ".

..20/20 hindsight, here we are all in RL issues, me, I should
have gone the Slackware way when Red Hat Inc ditched their
RH-7.4 and "all" the grey beards said "Go Debian!". Yeehaw.

> as shown by the page at
> https://pkginfo.devuan.org/cgi-bin/policy-query.html?c=package&q=linux-image-5*&x=submit

..top hit now @ Mon Aug 14 02:44:04 CEST 2023, is 5.10.179-5~deb10u1:
https://pkginfo.devuan.org/cgi-bin/package-query.html?c=package&q=linux-image-5.10-rt-amd64=5.10.179-5~deb10u1

>
> which produces, among other things,
> linux-image-5.10.0-23-amd64 5.10.179-3

..nope. Try refresh that search page.

> <https://pkginfo.devuan.org/cgi-bin/package-query.html?c=package&q=linux-image-5.10.0-23-amd64=5.10.179-3>

..strange, your link above works. But
pool/DEBIAN/main/l/linux/linux-image-5.10.0-23-amd64-unsigned_5.10.179-3_amd64.deb
points to DEBIAN's
linux-image-5.10.0-23-amd64-unsigned_5.10.179-3_amd64.deb "@"
https://packages.debian.org/bullseye/kernel/linux-image-5.10.0-24-amd64-unsigned

..etc. Swapping out "24" for "23", I get to: ...
https://packages.debian.org/bullseye/kernel/linux-image-5.10.0-23-amd64-unsigned

...which means Debian may have found your bug, or another
bug in your highly beloved 5.10.179-3, and yanked it down.

..if you have a tech etc problem with that, update.

> http://deb.devuan.org/merged
> chimaera-proposed-updates/main
> amd64
> http://deb.devuan.org/merged
> chimaera-security/main
> amd64
>
> and since this is supposed to be GPL licensed,
> so the source code is supposed to be available.

..true. Have a competent paralegal do the git dance to fish it out of
Debian's git repository if you need it for any litigation purpose.


--
..med vennlig hilsen = with Kind Regards from Arnt Karlsen
...with a number of polar bear hunters in his ancestry...
Scenarios always come in sets of three:
best case, worst case, and just in case.